Compare commits

...

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zheyuan Wu
dd10a1969b complie 2026-03-29 15:36:18 -05:00
Zheyuan Wu
b270e1d5b5 update 2026-03-29 15:29:37 -05:00
7 changed files with 718 additions and 509 deletions

Binary file not shown.

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

View File

@@ -332,6 +332,26 @@ f_{\mathrm{sphere}}(x^{(1)}),\dots,f_{\mathrm{sphere}}(x^{(N)}),
$$ $$
and then evaluates the shortest interval containing mass at least $1-\kappa$. This gives an empirical observable-diameter proxy for the sphere family. The code also computes the empirical mean, median, standard deviation, and the normalized proxies obtained from sampled Lipschitz ratios. and then evaluates the shortest interval containing mass at least $1-\kappa$. This gives an empirical observable-diameter proxy for the sphere family. The code also computes the empirical mean, median, standard deviation, and the normalized proxies obtained from sampled Lipschitz ratios.
The experiment produces histograms of the observable values, upper-tail deficit plots for $\log_2 m - f_{\mathrm{sphere}}(x)$, and family-wise comparisons of partial diameter, standard deviation, and mean deficit. When available, these plots are overlaid with theoretical concentration scales derived from Lévy's lemma and related results \cite{lee_introduction_2018}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../results/exp-20260311-154003/hist_sphere_16.png}
Entropy distribution for $S^{15}$
\end{minipage}
\hfill
\begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../results/exp-20260311-154003/hist_sphere_256.png}
Entropy distribution for $S^{255}$
\end{minipage}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Visualized the concentration of measure phenomenon on complex projective space} \subsection{Visualized the concentration of measure phenomenon on complex projective space}
The second family is complex projective space The second family is complex projective space
@@ -385,56 +405,52 @@ For each dimension pair $(d_A,d_B)$, the experiment samples $N$ independent Haar
$$ $$
\log_2 d_A - S(\rho_A), \log_2 d_A - S(\rho_A),
$$ $$
and family-wise comparisons of partial diameter, standard deviation, and mean deficit. When available, these plots are overlaid with the Page average entropy and with Hayden-style concentration scales, which serve as theoretical guides rather than direct outputs of the simulation \cite{Hayden,Hayden_2006,Pages_conjecture_simple_proof}. and family-wise comparisons of partial diameter, standard deviation, and mean deficit. When available, these plots are overlaid with the Page average entropy and with Hayden-style concentration scales, which serve as theoretical guides rather than direct outputs of the simulation \cite{Hayden,Hayden_2006,Pages_conjecture_simple_proof}.
\subsection{Random sampling using Majorana Stellar representation}
The third family is the symmetric subspace \begin{figure}[ht]
$$ \centering
\operatorname{Sym}^N(\mathbb{C}^2), \begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
$$ \centering
which is naturally identified with $\mathbb{C}P^N$ after projectivization. In this model, a pure symmetric $N$-qubit state is written in the Dicke basis as \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../results/exp-20260311-154003/hist_cp_16x16.png}
$$
|\psi\rangle
=
\sum_{k=0}^{N} c_k |D^N_k\rangle,
\qquad
\sum_{k=0}^{N}|c_k|^2 = 1.
$$
The projective metric is again the Fubini--Study metric
$$
d_{FS}([\psi],[\phi])=\arccos |\langle \psi,\phi\rangle|.
$$
Sampling is performed by drawing a standard complex Gaussian vector Entropy distribution for $\mathbb{C}P^{15}\otimes\mathbb{C}P^{15}$
$$ \end{minipage}
(c_0,\dots,c_N)\in \mathbb{C}^{N+1} \hfill
$$ \begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
and normalizing it. This gives the unitarily invariant measure on the projective symmetric state space. \centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{../results/exp-20260311-154003/hist_cp_256x256.png}
The observable used by the code is the one-particle entropy of the symmetric state. From the coefficient vector $(c_0,\dots,c_N)$ one constructs the one-qubit reduced density matrix $\rho_1$, and then defines Entropy distribution for $\mathbb{C}P^{255}\otimes\mathbb{C}P^{255}$
$$ \end{minipage}
f_{\mathrm{Maj}}([\psi]) \end{figure}
=
S(\rho_1)
=
-\operatorname{Tr}(\rho_1 \log_2 \rho_1).
$$
Since $\rho_1$ is a qubit state, this observable takes values in $[0,1]$.
To visualize the same states in Majorana form, the code also associates to a sampled symmetric state its Majorana polynomial and computes its roots. After stereographic projection, these roots define $N$ points on $S^2$, called the Majorana stars \cite{Bengtsson_Zyczkowski_2017}. The resulting star plots are included only as geometric visualizations; they are not used to define the metric or the observable. The metric-measure structure used in the actual simulation remains the Fubini--Study metric and the unitarily invariant measure on the projective symmetric state space.
Thus, for each $N$, the simulation produces: \section{A conjecture on observable diameter for complex projective spaces}
\begin{enumerate}
\item a sample of symmetric states,
\item the corresponding one-body entropy values,
\item the shortest interval containing mass at least $1-\kappa$ in the push-forward distribution on $\mathbb{R}$,
\item empirical Lipschitz-normalized versions of this width,
\item and a separate Majorana-star visualization of representative samples.
\end{enumerate}
Taken together, these three families allow us to compare how entropy-based concentration behaves on a real sphere, on a general complex projective space carrying bipartite entanglement entropy, and on the symmetric subspace described by Majorana stellar data. Given all the simulations so far, what does the concentration theorem generalize the behavior of the lipschitz function $S^n\to \mathbb{R}$ and the lipschitz function $\mathbb{C}P^n\to \mathbb{R}$ as $n\to \infty$?
Hayden's work suggests that if the entropy function is a ``good'' proxy for the observable diameter, the difference of \textbf{the order of the growth} between $\obdiam(\mathbb{C}P^n(1);-\kappa)$ and $\obdiam(S^{2n+1}(1);-\kappa)$ should be smaller than $O(\sqrt{n})$.
\begin{theorem}{Wu's conjecture}
For $0<\kappa<1$,
$$
\obdiam(\mathbb{C}P^n(1);-\kappa)= O(\sqrt{n}).
$$
\end{theorem}
The sketch for the proof is as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item Entropy function is not globally lipschitz, so we need to bound the deficit of the entropy function.
\item Normalize by the Lipschitz constant of $f$ to obtain a weak lower bound for the observable diameter with the algebraic varieties on $\mathbb{C}P^n(1)$.
\item Continue to study and interpret the overall concentration mechanism geometrically through the positive Ricci curvature of the Fubini--Study metric and Lévy--Gromov type inequalities.
\end{itemize}
\ifSubfilesClassLoaded{ \ifSubfilesClassLoaded{
\printbibliography[title={References}] \printbibliography[title={References}]

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.