upgrade structures and migrate to nextra v4
This commit is contained in:
59
content/Math429/Math429_L3.md
Normal file
59
content/Math429/Math429_L3.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
# Lecture 3
|
||||
|
||||
## Chapter I Vector Spaces
|
||||
|
||||
### Subspaces 1C
|
||||
|
||||
Given a vector space $V$, a subset $W\subset V$ is called a subspace if
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\begin{cases}
|
||||
W\neq \phi\\
|
||||
W\textup{ is closed under addition and scalar multiplication}
|
||||
\end{cases}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
#### Definition 1.41
|
||||
|
||||
Direct Sum
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose $V_1,...,V_m$ are subspace of $V$. Their sum $V_1+...+V_m$ is called a direct sum if **each element** $\vec{v_1}+...+\vec{v_m}\in V_1+...+V_m$ in a unique way.
|
||||
|
||||
If $v_1+....+v_m$ is a direct sum, we write it as
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
v_1\oplus v_2\oplus ...\oplus v_m
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
|
||||
$V=\mathbb{R}^3$
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
V_1=\{(x,y,0):x,y\in \mathbb{R}\}\\
|
||||
V_2=\{(0,a,b):a,b\in \mathbb{R}\}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Is $V_1+V_2$ a direct sum?
|
||||
|
||||
**No, because there are other ways to build (0,0,0) in such space, which is not unique**
|
||||
|
||||
For vector $(0,0,0)=(x,y,0)+(0,a,b)$, as long as $y=-a$, there are other ways to build up the vector.
|
||||
|
||||
### Theorem 1.45
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose $V_1,...,V_m$ are subspaces of $V$, then $V_1+...+V_m$ is a direct sum if and only if the only way to write $\vec{0}=\vec{v_1}+...+\vec{v_m}$ with $\vec{v_1}\in V_1,...,\vec{v_m}\in V_m$. is $\vec{v_1}=...=\vec{v_m}=\vec{0}$
|
||||
|
||||
Proof:
|
||||
|
||||
$\Rightarrow$
|
||||
|
||||
If $\vec{v_1}=...=\vec{v_m}$ is a direct sum, then the only way to write $\vec{0}=\vec{v_1}+...+\vec{v_m}$ where $\vec{v_i}\in V_i$ is $\vec{0}=\vec{0}+...+\vec{0}$ **follows from the definition of direct sum**
|
||||
|
||||
$\Leftarrow$
|
||||
|
||||
Need to show if the property holds for $\vec{0}$, then it holds for any $\vec{v}\in V_1+...+V_m$ $\iff$ If the property fails for any $\vec{v}\in V_1+...+V_m$, then it fails for $\vec{0}$
|
||||
|
||||
If a vector $\vec{v}\in V_1+...+V_m$ satisfies $\vec{v}=\vec{v_1}+\vec{v_2}+...+\vec{v_m}=\vec{u_1}+\vec{u_2}+...+\vec{u_m}$, $\vec{v_i},\vec{u_i}\in V_i$ and there exists $i\in\{1,...,m\}\vec{v_i}\neq \vec{u_i}$,
|
||||
|
||||
then $(\vec{v_1}+\vec{v_2}+...+\vec{v_m})-(\vec{u_1}+\vec{u_2}+...+\vec{u_m})=\vec{0}$
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user