# Math4201 Topology I (Lecture 29)
## Compact and connected spaces
### Compact spaces
#### Theorem of uncountable compact Hausdorff spaces without isolated points
Any non-empty compact Hausdorff space $X$ without any isolated points is uncountable.
Proof
By contradiction, let $X=\{x_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a countable set.
We construct inductively a sequence of open non-empty subspaces $\{V_i\}$ of $X$ such that
$$
\overline{V_1}\supseteq \overline{V_2}\supseteq \overline{V_3}\supseteq \dots
$$
where $x_i$ not in $\overline{V_i}$.
This could imply that for any $j\leq i$, $x_j$ is not in $\overline{V_j}$ but $\overline{V_j}\supseteq \overline{V_i}$. This contradicts the fact that $x_j$ not in $\overline{V_i}$, that is $x_1, ..., x_i$ are not in $\overline{V_i}$.
This is a contradiction because $\{\overline{V_i}\}$ satisfies the finite intersection property.
$$
\bigcap_{i=1}^\infty \overline{V_i} \neq \emptyset
$$
But in this case, $\bigcap_{i=1}^\infty \overline{V_i} = \emptyset$ because $x_i$ not in $\overline{V_i}$.
To construct such $\{V_i\}$, we can start with $V_1,\dots, V_{k-1}$ are constructed, then there is a point $y_k$ in $V_{k-1}$ which isn't same as $x_k$.
So $x_k$ not in $\overline{V_k}$ because $U_k$ is an open neighborhood of $x_k$ that don't intersect with $V_k$.
Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there exists an open neighborhood $U_k$ of $x_k$ and $U_y$ of $y_k$ such that $U_k\cap U_y=\emptyset$.
Let $x_k\in U_k$ and $y_k\in W_k\subseteq X$ that is open, and $U_k\cap W_k=\emptyset$.
Let $V_k=W_k\cap V_{k-1}$. Then this is open and is contained in $V_{k-1}$ since $\overline{V_k}\subseteq \overline{V_{k-1}}$.
Case 1: $x_k\notin V_{k-1}$. There is such $y_k$ because $V_{k-1}$ is not empty.
Case 2: $x_k\in V_{k-1}$. Since $x_k$ is not isolated points, any open neighborhood of $x_k$ including $V_{k-1}$ contains another point.
Therefore, $X$ is uncountable.
#### Definition of limit point compact
A space $X$ is limit point compact if any infinite subset of $X$ has a [limit point](./Math4201_L8#limit-points) in $X$.
_That is, $\forall A\subseteq X$ and $A$ is infinite, there exists a point $x\in X$ such that $x\in U$, $\forall U\in \mathcal{T}$ containing $x$, $(U-\{x\})\cap A\neq \emptyset$._
_This property also holds for finite sets, for example, any finite set with discrete topology is limit point compact. (since you cannot find a infinite subset of a finite set that has a limit point)_
#### Definition of sequentially compact
A space $X$ is sequentially compact if any sequence has a convergent subsequence. i.e. If $\{x_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ is a sequence in $X$, then there are $n_1
Example of limit point compact spaces but not compact
Let $X'=\{a,b\}$ with trivial topology, and $X=\mathbb{N}\times X'$ with the product topology where we use the discrete topology on $\mathbb{N}$.
$X$ isn't compact because $\{\{i\}\times X':i\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is an open cover of $X$ that doesn't have a finite subcover.
because these open sets are disjoint, $X$ is limit point compact.
Let $A\subseteq X$ be an infinite subset of $X$. In particular, it contains a point of the form $(i,a)$ or $(i,b)$ for $i\in\mathbb{N}$. Let $(i,a)\in A$. Then $(i,b)$ is a limit point of $A$, since any open neighborhood ($\{i\}\times X'$) of $(i,b)$ contains a point of the form $(i,a)$ or $(i,b)$.
$X$ is not sequentially compact because the sequence $\{(n,a)\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ has no convergent subsequence.
Proof
First, we show that 1. implies 2.
We proceed by contradiction.
Let $X$ be compact and $A\subseteq X$ be an infinite subset of $X$ that doesn't have any limit points.
Then $X-A$ is open because any $x\in X-A$ isn't in the closure of $A$ otherwise it would be a limit point for $A$, and hence $x$ has an open neighborhood contained in the complement of $A$.
Next, let $x\in A$. Since $x$ isn't a limit point of $A$, there is an open neighborhood $U_x$ of $x$ in $X$ that $U_x\cap A=\{x\}$. Now consider the open covering of $X$ given as
$$
\{X-A\}\cup \{U_x:x\in A\}
$$
This is an open cover because either $x\in X-A$ or $x\in A$ and in the latter case, $x\in U_x$ since $X$ is compact, this should have a finite subcover. Any such subcover should contain $U_x$ for any $x$ because $U_x$ is the element in the subcover for $x$.
This implies that our finite cover contains infinite open sets, which is a contradiction.
---
Continue with the proof that 2. implies 3. next time.
#### Corollary of compact spaces
1. If $X$ is a compact topological space, then it is limit point compact.
2. If $X$ is a sequentially compact topological space, then it is limit point compact.
Proof
Proof of 1. follows from the theorem of limit point compact spaces.
That means, sequentially compact is a stronger property than limit point compact, and compact is the stronger property than limit point compact.
> [!WARNING]
>
> Hope you will not use it soon for your exams but here are some interesting examples.
>
> **There exists spaces that are sequentially compact but not compact.**
>
> [link to spaces](https://topology.pi-base.org/spaces?q=Sequentially%20Compact%2B%7ECompact)
>
> [S000035](https://topology.pi-base.org/spaces/S000035)
>
> **There exists spaces that are compact but not sequentially compact.**
>
> [link to spaces](https://topology.pi-base.org/spaces?q=Compact%2B%7ESequentially%20Compact)
>
> Consider the space of functions $f:[0,1]\to [0,1]$ with the topology of pointwise convergence. This space is compact $I^I$ but not sequentially compact (You can always find a sequence of functions that does not converge to any function in the space, when there is uncountable many functions in the space).
>
> [S000103](https://topology.pi-base.org/spaces/S000103)