updates
This commit is contained in:
@@ -342,6 +342,93 @@ An atlas is said to be **smooth** if the transition maps $\phi_\alpha\circ \phi_
|
||||
|
||||
A smooth manifold is a pair $(M,\mathcal{A})$ where $M$ is a topological manifold and $\mathcal{A}$ is a smooth atlas.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lie group
|
||||
|
||||
Lie group is a group (satisfying group axioms: closure, associativity, identity, inverses) that is also a smooth manifold. with the operator $m:G\times G\to G$, and the inverse operation $i:G\to G$ that are both smooth.
|
||||
|
||||
In short, a Lie group is a group that is also a smooth manifold with map $G\times G\to G$ given by $(g,h)\mapsto gh^-1$ that is smooth.
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>Example of Lie group</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
The general linear group $GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ is the group of all $n\times n$ invertible matrices over $\mathbb{R}$.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a Lie group since
|
||||
|
||||
1. Multiplication is a smooth map $GL(n,\mathbb{R})\times GL(n,\mathbb{R})\to GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ since it is a polynomial map.
|
||||
2. Inverse is a smooth map $GL(n,\mathbb{R})\to GL(n,\mathbb{R})$ by cramer's rule.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
If $G$ is a Lie group, then any open subgroup (with subgroup topology and open set in $G$) $H$ of $G$ is also a Lie group.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Translation map on Lie group
|
||||
|
||||
If $G$ is a Lie group, then the translation map $L_g:G\to G$ given by $L_g(h)=gh$ and $R_g:G\to G$ given by $R_g(h)=hg$ are both smooth and are diffeomorphisms on $G$.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Derivation and tangent vectors
|
||||
|
||||
The directional derivative of a geometric tangent vector $v_a\in \mathbb{R}^n_a$ yields a map $D_v\vert_a:C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)\to \mathbb{R}$ given by the formula
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
D_v\vert_a(f)=D_v f(a)=\frac{d}{dt}\bigg\vert_{t=0}f(a+tv_a)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Note that this is a linear over $\mathbb{R}$, and satisfies the product rule.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
D_v\vert_a(f\cdot g)=f(a)D_v\vert_a(g)+g(a)D_v\vert_a(f)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
We can generalize this representation to the following definition:
|
||||
|
||||
If $a$ is a point of $\mathbb{R}^n$, then a **derivation at $a$** is a linear map $w:C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)\to \mathbb{R}$ such that it is linear over $\mathbb{R}$ and satisfies the product rule.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
w(f\cdot g)=w(f)\cdot g(a)+f(a)\cdot w(g)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Let $T_a\mathbb{R}^n$ denote the set of all derivations of $C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$ at $a$. So $T_a\mathbb{R}^n$ is a vector space over $\mathbb{R}$.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
(w_1+w_2)(f)=w_1(f)+w_2(f),\quad (cw)(f)=c(w(f))
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Some key properties are given below and check the proof in the book for details.
|
||||
|
||||
1. If $f$ is a constant function, then $w(f)=0$.
|
||||
2. If $f(a)=g(a)=0$, then $w(f\cdot g)=0$.
|
||||
3. For each geometric tangent vector $v_a\in \mathbb{R}^n_a$, the map $D_v\vert_a:C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)\to \mathbb{R}$ is a derivation at $a$.
|
||||
4. The map $v_a\mapsto D_v\vert_a$ is an isomorphism of vector spaces from $\mathbb{R}^n_a$ to $T_a\mathbb{R}^n$.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Tangent vector on Manifolds
|
||||
|
||||
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $p\in M$. A **tangent vector to $M$ at $p$** is a derivation at $p$ if it satisfies:
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
v(f\cdot g)=f(p)vg+g(p)vf\prod \text{ for all } f,g\in C^\infty(M)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
The set of all derivations of $C^\infty(M)$ at $p$ is denoted by $T_pM$ is called tangent space to $M$ at $p$. An element of $T_pM$ is called a tangent vector to $M$ at $p$.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Tangent bundle
|
||||
|
||||
We define the tangent bundle of $M$ as the disjoint union of all the tangent spaces:
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
TM=\bigsqcup_{p\in M} T_pM
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
We write the element in $TM$ as pair $(p,v)$ where $p\in M$ and $v\in T_pM$.
|
||||
|
||||
The tangent bundle comes with a natural projection map $\pi:TM\to M$ given by $\pi(p,v)=p$.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Vector field
|
||||
|
||||
> CONTINUE HERE to study the importance of Lie algebra and Lie group for vector fields.
|
||||
|
||||
### Riemannian manifolds
|
||||
|
||||
A Riemannian manifold is a smooth manifold equipped with a **Riemannian metric**, which is a smooth assignment of an inner product to each tangent space $T_pM$ of the manifold.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -134,6 +134,20 @@ $$
|
||||
|F(z)|^2\leq d_z \|F\|^2_{L^2(U,\alpha)}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose we have a sequence $F_n\in \mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$ such that $F_n\to F$, $F\in L^2(U,\alpha)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Then $F_n$ is a cauchy sequence in $L^2(U,\alpha)$. So,
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\sup_{v\in V}|F_n(v)-F_m(v)|\leq \sqrt{d_z}\|F_n-F_m\|_{L^2(U,\alpha)}\to 0\text{ as }n,m\to \infty
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
So the sequence $F_m$ converges locally uniformly to some limit function which must be $F$ ($\mathbb{C}^d$ is Hausdorff, unique limit point).
|
||||
|
||||
Locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic. (Use Morera's Theorem to show that the limit is still holomorphic in each variable.) So the limit function $F$ is actually in $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$, which shows that $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$ is closed.
|
||||
|
||||
which shows that $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$ is closed.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
> [!TIP]
|
||||
@@ -169,6 +183,45 @@ Let $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$ be a holomorphic space. The reproducing kernel of
|
||||
|F(z)|^2\leq K(z,z) \|F\|^2_{L^2(U,\alpha)}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>Proof</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
For part 1, By [Riesz Theorem](../../Math429/Math429_L27#theorem-642-riesz-representation-theorem), the linear functional evaluation at $z\in U$ on $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$ can be represented uniquely as inner product with some $\phi_z\in \mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$.
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
F(z)=\langle F,\phi_z\rangle_{L^2(U,\alpha)}=\int_U F(w)\overline{\phi_z(w)} \alpha(w) dw
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
And assume part 2 is true, then we have
|
||||
|
||||
$K(z,w)=\overline{\phi_z(w)}$
|
||||
|
||||
So part 1 is true.
|
||||
|
||||
For part 2, we can use the same argument
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\phi_z(w)=\langle \phi_z,\phi_w\rangle_{L^2(U,\alpha)}=\overline{\langle \phi_w,\phi_z\rangle_{L^2(U,\alpha)}}=\overline{\phi_w(z)}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
... continue if needed.
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
#### Construction of reproducing kernel
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\{e_j\}$ be any orthonormal basis of $\mathcal{H}L^2(U,\alpha)$. Then for all $z,w\in U$,
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} |e_j(z)\overline{e_j(w)}|<\infty
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
and
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
K(z,w)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} e_j(z)\overline{e_j(w)}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
### Bargmann space
|
||||
|
||||
The Bargmann spaces are the holomorphic spaces
|
||||
@@ -180,5 +233,38 @@ $$
|
||||
where
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\mu_t(z)=\text{ CONTINUE HERE }
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\mu_t(z)=(\pi t)^{-d}\exp(-|z|^2/t)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
> For this research, we can tentatively set $t=1$ and $d=2$ for simplicity so that you can continue to read the next section.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Reproducing kernel for Bargmann space
|
||||
|
||||
For all $d\geq 1$, the reproducing kernel of the space $\mathcal{H}L^2(\mathbb{C}^d,\mu_t)$ is given by
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
K(z,w)=\exp(z\cdot \overline{w}/t)
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
where $z\cdot \overline{w}=\sum_{k=1}^d z_k\overline{w_k}$.
|
||||
|
||||
This gives the pointwise bounds
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|F(z)|^2\leq \exp(\|z\|^2/t) \|F\|^2_{L^2(\mathbb{C}^d,\mu_t)}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
For all $F\in \mathcal{H}L^2(\mathbb{C}^d,\mu_t)$, and $z\in \mathbb{C}^d$.
|
||||
|
||||
> Proofs are intentionally skipped, you can refer to the lecture notes for details.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Lie bracket of vector fields
|
||||
|
||||
Let $X,Y$ be two vector fields on a smooth manifold $M$. The Lie bracket of $X$ and $Y$ is an operator $[X,Y]:C^\infty(M)\to C^\infty(M)$ defined by
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
[X,Y](f)=X(Y(f))-Y(X(f))
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
This operator is a vector field.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user