5.1 KiB
Math416 Lecture 20
Laurent Series and Isolated Singularities
Isolated Singularities
f has an isolated singularity at z_0 if f is analytic everywhere in some punctured disk 0 < |z - z_0| < R except at z_0 itself.
Removable Singularities
We call z_0 a removable singularity if there exists g\in O(B_r(z_0)) such that f(z) = g(z) for all z\in B_r(z_0) \setminus \{z_0\}.
Poles
We call z_0 a pole if there are finitely many terms with negative powers in the Laurent series expansion of f about z_0.
Essential Singularities
We call z_0 an essential singularity if there are infinitely many terms with negative powers in the Laurent series expansion of f about z_0.
Theorem: Criterion for a removable singularity (Riemann removable singularity theorem)
Suppose f has an isolated singularity at z_0. Then it is removable if and only if f is bounded on a punctured disk centered at z_0.
Theorem 8.10 (Casorati-Weierstrass Theorem)
If z_0 is an essential singularity of f, then \forall r>0, \overline{f(B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\})}= \mathbb{C}.
Proof:
Suppose w\notin closure range fo f on B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}, then \exists \epsilon > 0 such that B_\epsilon(w)\cap f(B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\})=\emptyset.
g(z)=1/(f(z)-w) and |g(z)|\leq \frac{1}{\epsilon}, which is bounded. By Riemann removable singularity theorem, g has a removable singularity. So f(z)=\frac{1}{g(z)}+w is holomorphic on B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}.
Suppose g(z_0)\neq 0, then f has a removable singularity at z_0.
Suppose g(z_0)=0, then f has a pole at z_0.
This contradicts the assumption that z_0 is an essential singularity.
QED
Theorem 8.11 (Picard's Theorem)
If z_0 is an essential singularity of f, then \forall r>0, f(B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}) contains every point in \mathbb{C} except possibly one.
Definition: Residue
Suppose f has an isolated singularity at z_0. The residue of f at z_0, write res_{z_0}(f), is the coefficient of (z-z_0)^{-1} in the Laurent series expansion of f about z_0.
Preview:
Residue Theorem:
Suppose
Gis a simply connected domain,Fis a finite set inGhis holomorphic onG\setminus F. Let\gammabe a simple closed curve inG, containing\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \cdots, \lambda_NfromF. Then\int_\gamma h(z) dz = 2\pi i \sum_{j=1}^N res_{\lambda_j}(h)
Special case:
When \gamma=\partial B_r(z_0), f(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n converges on A(z_0;0,R), then
\int_{\gamma} f(z) dz = 2\pi i \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty a_n \int_{\gamma} (z-z_0)^n dz=2\pi i a_{-1}
Example:
- Find residue of
f(z)=\frac{\sin z}{z^4}atz=0.
\sin z = z - \frac{z^3}{3!} + \frac{z^5}{5!} - \cdots
\frac{\sin z}{z^4} = \frac{1}{z^4} - \frac{1}{3!z} + \frac{z}{5!} - \cdots
res_{z=0}(\frac{\sin z}{z^4}) = \frac{1}{3!}
- Find residue of
f(z)=\frac{1}{(z+2)(z-5)}atz=5andz=-2.
res_{z=5}(f(z))=(z-5)^{-1}\cdot\frac{1}{z+2}|_{z=5}=\frac{1}{7}
res_{z=-2}(f(z))=(z+2)^{-1}\cdot\frac{1}{z-5}|_{z=-2}=-\frac{1}{7}
Corollary of residue
Suppose f has an simple pole at z_0. Then res_{z_0}(f)=\lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)f(z).
Proof:
f(z)=a_{-1}(z-z_0)^{-1}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n, (z-z_0)f(z)=a_{-1}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^{n+1}
\lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)f(z)=\lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)\cdot a_{-1}+\lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)\cdot\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n=a_{-1}
QED
Find residue for poles with higher order
Suppose f has a pole of order 2 at z_0. Then f(z)=\frac{a_{-2}}{(z-z_0)^2}+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-z_0}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^n, (z-z_0)^2f(z)=a_{-2}+(z-z_0)a_{-1}+\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n(z-z_0)^{n+2}
Method 1:
res_{z_0}(f)=a_{-1}=\lim_{z\to z_0}\frac{f(z)-\lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)^2f(z)}{(z-z_0)}
Method 2:
res_{z_0}(f)=\frac{1}{(n-1)!}\frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}(z-z_0)^nf(z)|_{z=z_0}
So suppose f has a pole of order n at z_0. Then res_{z_0}(f)=\frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}(z-z_0)^nf(z)|_{z=z_0}
Proof:
f(z)=\frac{a_{-n}}{(z-z_0)^n}+\frac{a_{-n+1}}{(z-z_0)^{n-1}}+\cdots+\frac{a_{-1}}{z-z_0}+\sum_{m=0}^\infty a_m(z-z_0)^m
(z-z_0)^nf(z)=a_{-n}+(z-z_0)a_{-n+1}+\cdots+(z-z_0)^{n-1}a_{-1}+\sum_{m=0}^\infty a_m(z-z_0)^{m+n}
\frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}(z-z_0)^nf(z)=(n-1)!a_{-1}+\sum_{m=0}^\infty a_m(m+n)(m+n-1)\cdots(m+1)(z-z_0)^{m-1}
\lim_{z\to z_0}\frac{1}{(n-1)!}\frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}(z-z_0)^nf(z)=a_{-1}
QED
Chapter 9: Generalized Cauchy's Theorem
Simple connectedness
Proposition 9.1
Let \phi be a continuous nowhere vanishing function from [a,b]\subset\mathbb{R} to \mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}. Then there exists a continuous function \psi:[a,b]\to\mathbb{C} such that e^{\psi(t)}=\phi(t) for all t\in[a,b].
Moreover, \psi is uniquely determined up to an additive integer multiple of 2\pi i \mathbb{Z}.
Proof:
Uniqueness:
Suppose \phi_1 and \phi_2 are both continuous functions so that e^{\phi_1(t)}=\phi(t)=e^{\phi_2(t)} for all t\in[a,b].
Then e^{\phi_1(t)-\phi_2(t)}=1 for all t\in[a,b]. So \phi_1(t)-\phi_2(t)=2k\pi i for some k\in\mathbb{Z}.
Existence:
Continue on Thursday.
QED