5.0 KiB
Math4201 Topology I (Lecture 27)
Continue on compact spaces
Compact spaces
Heine-Borel theorem
A subset K\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded with respect to the standard metric on \mathbb{R}^n.
Definition of bounded
A\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is bounded if there exists c\in \mathbb{R}^{>0} such that d(x,y)<c for all x,y\in A.
Proof for Heine-Borel theorem
Suppose k\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is compact.
Since \mathbb{R}^n is Hausdorff, K\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is compact, so K is closed subspace of \mathbb{R}^n. by Proposition of compact subspaces with Hausdorff property.
To show that K is bounded, consider the open cover with the following balls:
B_1(0), B_2(0), ..., B_n(0), ...
Since K is compact, there are n_1, ..., n_k\in \mathbb{N} such that K\subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^k B_{n_i}(0). Note that B_{n_i}(0) is bounded, so K is bounded. \forall x,y\in B_{n_i}(0), d(x,y)<2n_i. So K is bounded.
Suppose K\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is closed and bounded.
First let M=[a_1,b_1]\times [a_2,b_2]\times \cdots \times [a_n,b_n].
This is compact because it is a product of compact spaces.
Since K is bounded, we can find $[a_i,b_i]$s such that K\subseteq M.
Since K is closed subspace of \mathbb{R}^n, K is closed in M.
Since any closed subspace of a compact space is compact, K is compact.
Warning
This theorem is not true for general topological spaces.
For example, take
X=B_1(0)with the standard topology on\mathbb{R}^n.Take
K=B_1(0), this is not compact because it is not closed in\mathbb{R}^n.
Extreme Value Theorem
If f:X\to \mathbb{R} is continuous map with X being compact. Then f attains its minimum and maximum.
Proof
Let M=\sup\{f(x)\mid x\in X\} and m=\inf\{f(x)\mid x\in X\}.
We want to show that there are x_m,x_M\in X such that f(x_m)=m and f(x_M)=M.
Consider the open covering of X given as
\{U_\alpha\coloneqq f^{-1}((-\infty, \alpha))\}_{\alpha\in \mathbb{R}}
If X doesn't attain its maximum, then this is an open covering of X:
U_\alphais open becausefis continuous and(-\infty, \alpha)is open in\mathbb{R}.\bigcup_{\alpha\in \mathbb{R}} U_\alpha = Xbecause for anyx\in X, by the assumption there isx'\in Xwithf(x)<f(x')(otherwisef(x)is the maximum value). Thenx\in U_{f(x')}.
So there is an open covering of X and hence it's got a finite subcover \{U_{\alpha_i}\}_{i=1}^n.
X=\bigcup_{i=1}^n U_{\alpha_i}=\bigcup_{i=1}^n f^{-1}((-\infty, \alpha_i))=f^{-1}(-\infty, \alpha_k)
and \alpha_1\leq \alpha_2\leq \cdots \leq \alpha_n. There is x_i such that \alpha_i=f(x_i).
Note that x_k\notin U_{\alpha_k} because f(x_k)>\alpha_k. So x_k\notin X. This contradicts the assumption that X doesn't attain its maximum.
Theorem of uniform continuity
Let f:(X,d)\to (X',d') be a continuous map between two metric spaces. Let X be compact, then for any \epsilon > 0, there exists \delta > 0 such that for any x_1,x_2\in X, if d(x_1,x_2)<\delta, then d'(f(x_1),f(x_2))<\epsilon.
Definition of uniform continuous function
f is uniformly continuous if for any \epsilon > 0, there exists \delta > 0 such that for any x_1,x_2\in X, if d(x_1,x_2)<\delta, then d'(f(x_1),f(x_2))<\epsilon.
Example of uniform continuous function
Let f(x)=x^2 on \mathbb{R}.
This is not uniformly continuous because for fixed \epsilon > 0, the interval \delta will converge to zero as x_1,x_2 goes to infinity.
However, if we take f\mid_{[0,1]}, this is uniformly continuous because for fixed \epsilon > 0, we can choose \delta = \epsilon.
Lebesgue number lemma
Let X be a compact metric space and \{U_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in I} be an open cover of X. Then there is \delta>0 such that for any two points x_1,x_2\in X with d(x_1,x_2)<\delta, there is \alpha\in I such that x_1,x_2\in U_\alpha.
Proof of uniform continuity theorem
Let \epsilon > 0. be given and consider
\{f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x'))\}_{x'\in X'}
We claim that there is an open covering of X.
f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x')))is open becausefis continuous andB_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x'))is open inX'.X=\bigcup_{x'\in X'} f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x')))because for anyx\in X,x\in f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((f(x))).
Since X is compact, there is a finite subcover \{f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x')))\}_{i=1}^n.
By Lebesgue number lemma, there is \delta>0 such that for any two points x_1,x_2\in X with d(x_1,x_2)<\delta, there is x'\in X' such that x_1,x_2\in f^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x'))).
So f(x_1),f(x_2)\in B_{\epsilon/2}^{d'}((x')).
Apply the triangle inequality with d'(x_1,x') and d'(x_2,x'), we have d'(f(x_1),f(x_2))<2\epsilon/2=\epsilon.