5.2 KiB
Math4201 Topology I (Lecture 12)
Metric spaces
Basic properties and definitions
Definition of metric space
A metric space is a set X with a function d:X\times X\to \mathbb{R} that satisfies the following properties:
\forall x,y\in X, d(x,y)\geq 0andd(x,y)=0if and only ifx=y. (positivity)\forall x,y\in X, d(x,y)=d(y,x). (symmetry)\forall x,y,z\in X, d(x,z)\leq d(x,y)+d(y,z). (triangle inequality)
Example of metric space
Let X=\mathbb{R} and d(x,y)=|x-y|.
Check definition of metric space:
- Positivity:
d(x,y)=|x-y|\geq 0andd(x,y)=0if and only ifx=y. - Symmetry:
d(x,y)=|x-y|=|y-x|=d(y,x). - Triangle inequality:
d(x,z)=|x-z|\leq |x-y|+|y-z|=d(x,y)+d(y,z)since|a+b|\leq |a|+|b|for alla,b\in \mathbb{R}.
Let X be arbitrary. The trivial metric is $d(x,y)=\begin{cases}
0 & \text{if } x=y \
1 & \text{if } x\neq y
\end{cases}$
Check definition of metric space:
- Positivity: $d(x,y)=\begin{cases}
0 & \text{if } x=y \
1 & \text{if } x\neq y
\end{cases}\geq 0$ and
d(x,y)=0if and only ifx=y. - Symmetry: $d(x,y)=\begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } x=y \ 1 & \text{if } x\neq y \end{cases}=d(y,x)$.
- Triangle inequality use case by case analysis.
Balls of a metric space forms a basis for a topology
Let (X,d) be a metric space. x\in X and r>0, r\in \mathbb{R}. We define the ball of radius r centered at x as B_r(x)=\{y\in X:d(x,y)<r\}.
Goal: Show that the balls of a metric space forms a basis for a topology.
\{B_r(x)|x\in X,r>0,r\in \mathbb{R}\}\text{ is a basis for a topology on }X
Example of balls of a metric space
Let X=\mathbb{R} and $d(x,y)=\begin{cases}
0 & \text{if } x=y \
1 & \text{if } x\neq y
\end{cases}$
The balls of this metric space are:
B_r(x)=\begin{cases}
\{x\} & \text{if } r<1 \\
X & \text{if } r\geq 1
\end{cases}
Note
This basis generate the discrete topology of
X.
Let X=\mathbb{R} and d(x,y)=|x-y|.
The balls of this metric space are:
B_r(x)=\{(x-r,x+r)\}
This basis is the set of all open sets in \mathbb{R}, which generates the standard topology of \mathbb{R}.
Proof
Let's check the two properties of basis:
\forall x\in X,\exists B_r(x)\in \{B_r(x)|x\in X,r>0,r\in \mathbb{R}\}such thatx\in B_r(x). (Trivial by definition of non-zero radius ball)\forall B_r(x),B_r(y)\in \{B_r(x)|x\in X,r>0,r\in \mathbb{R}\},\forall z\in B_r(x)\cap B_r(y),\exists B_r(z)\in \{B_r(x)|x\in X,r>0,r\in \mathbb{R}\}such thatz\in B_r(z)\subseteq B_r(x)\cap B_r(y).
Observe that for any z\in B_r(x), then there exists \delta>0 such that B_\delta(z)\subseteq B_r(x).
Let \delta=r-d(x,z), then B_\delta(z)\subseteq B_r(x) (by triangle inequality)
Similarly, there exists \delta'>0 such that B_\delta'(z)\subseteq B_r(y).
Take \lambda=min\{\delta,\delta'\}, then B_\lambda(z)\subseteq B_r(x)\cap B_r(y).
Definition of Metric topology
For any metric space (X,d), the topology generated by the balls of the metric space is called metric topology.
Definition of metrizable
A topological space (X,\mathcal{T}) is metrizable if it is the metric topology for some metric d on X.
Q: When is a topological space metrizable?
Lemma: Every metric topology is Hausdorff
If a topology isn't Hausdorff, then it isn't metrizable.
Example of non-metrizable space
Trivial topology with at least two points is not Hausdorff, so it isn't metrizable.
Finite complement topology on infinite set is not Hausdorff.
Suppose there exists x,y\in X such that x\neq y and x\in U\subseteq X and y\in V\subseteq X such that X-U and X-V are finite.
Since U\cap V=\emptyset, we have V\subseteq X-U, which is finite. So X-V is infinite. (contradiction that X-V is finite)
So X with finite complement topology is not Hausdorff, so it isn't metrizable.
Proof
Let x,y\in (X,d) and x\neq y. To show that X is Hausdorff, it is suffices to show that there exists r,r'>0 such that B_r(x)\cap B_r'(y)=\emptyset.
Take r=r'=\frac{1}{2}d(x,y), then B_r(x)\cap B_r'(y)=\emptyset. (by triangle inequality)
We prove this by contradiction.
Suppose \exists z\in B_r(x)\cap B_r'(y), then d(x,z)<r and d(y,z)<r'.
Then d(x,y)\leq d(x,z)+d(z,y)<r+r'=\frac{1}{2}d(x,y)+\frac{1}{2}d(x,y)=d(x,y). (contradiction d(x,y)<d(x,y))
Therefore, X is Hausdorff.
Other metrics on \mathbb{R}^n
Let \mathbb{R}^n be the set of all $n$-tuples of real numbers with standard topology.
Let d: \mathbb{R}^n\times \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R} be defined by (the Euclidean distance)
d(u,v)=\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^n (u_i-v_i)^2}
In \mathbb{R}^2 the ball is a circle.
Let \rho(u,v)=\max_{i=1}^n |u_i-v_i|. (Square metric)
In \mathbb{R}^2 the ball is a square.
Let m(u,v)=\sum_{i=1}^n |u_i-v_i|. (Manhattan metric)
In \mathbb{R}^2 the ball is a diamond.
Lemma: Square metric, Manhattan metric, and Euclidean metric are well defined metrics on \mathbb{R}^n
Proof ignored. Hard part is to show the triangle inequality. May use Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.