Files
NoteNextra-origin/content/Math401/Math401_P1_1.md
Trance-0 d0e4c8a23c update?
2025-07-19 14:53:08 -05:00

6.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Math 401 Paper 1, Side note 1: Quantum information theory and Measure concentration

Typicality

The idea of typicality in high-dimensions is very important topic in understanding this paper and taking it to the next level of detail under language of mathematics. I'm trying to comprehend these material and write down my understanding in this note.

Let X be the alphabet of our source of information.

Let x^n=x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n be a sequence with x_i\in X.

We say that x^n is $\epsilon$-typical with respect to p(x) if

  • For all a\in X with p(a)>0, we have

\|\frac{1}{n}N(a|x^n)-p(a)|\leq \frac{\epsilon}{\|X\|}
  • For all a\in X with p(a)=0, we have

N(a|x^n)=0

Here N(a|x^n) is the number of times a appears in x^n. That's basically saying that:

  1. The difference between the probability of a appearing in $x^n$ and the probability of a appearing in the source of information $p(a)$ should be within \epsilon divided by the size of the alphabet X of the source of information.
  2. The probability of a not appearing in x^n should be 0.

Here are two easy propositions that can be proved:

For \epsilon>0, the probability of a sequence being $\epsilon$-typical goes to 1 as n goes to infinity.

If x^n is $\epsilon$-typical, then the probability of x^n is produced is 2^{-n[H(X)+\epsilon]}\leq p(x^n)\leq 2^{-n[H(X)-\epsilon]}.

The number of $\epsilon$-typical sequences is at least 2^{n[H(X)+\epsilon]}.

Recall that H(X)=-\sum_{a\in X}p(a)\log_2 p(a) is the entropy of the source of information.

Shannon theory in Quantum information theory

Shannon theory provides a way to quantify the amount of information in a message.

Practically speaking:

  • A holy grail for error-correcting codes
  • Conceptually speaking:
  • An operationally-motivated way of thinking about correlations
  • Whats missing (for a quantum mechanic)?
    • Features from linear structure:
      • Entanglement and non-orthogonality

Partial trace and purification

Partial trace

Recall that the bipartite state of a quantum system is a linear operator on \mathscr{H}=\mathscr{A}\otimes \mathscr{B}, where \mathscr{A} and \mathscr{B} are finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

Definition of partial trace for arbitrary linear operators

Let T be a linear operator on \mathscr{H}=\mathscr{A}\otimes \mathscr{B}, where \mathscr{A} and \mathscr{B} are finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

An operator T on \mathscr{H}=\mathscr{A}\otimes \mathscr{B} can be written as (by the definition of tensor product of linear operators)


T=\sum_{i=1}^n a_i A_i\otimes B_i

where A_i is a linear operator on \mathscr{A} and B_i is a linear operator on \mathscr{B}.

The $\mathscr{B}$-partial trace of T (\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathscr{B}}(T):\mathcal{L}(\mathscr{A}\otimes \mathscr{B})\to \mathcal{L}(\mathscr{A})) is the linear operator on \mathscr{A} defined by


\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathscr{B}}(T)=\sum_{i=1}^n a_i \operatorname{Tr}(B_i) A_i

Partial trace for density operators

Let \rho be a density operator in \mathscr{H}_1\otimes\mathscr{H}_2, the partial trace of \rho over \mathscr{H}_2 is the density operator in \mathscr{H}_1 (reduced density operator for the subsystem \mathscr{H}_1) given by:


\rho_1\coloneqq\operatorname{Tr}_2(\rho)
Examples

Let \rho=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|01\rangle+|10\rangle) be a density operator on \mathscr{H}=\mathbb{C}^2\otimes \mathbb{C}^2.

Expand the expression of \rho in the basis of \mathbb{C}^2\otimes\mathbb{C}^2 using linear combination of basis vectors:


\rho=\frac{1}{2}(|01\rangle\langle 01|+|01\rangle\langle 10|+|10\rangle\langle 01|+|10\rangle\langle 10|)

Note \operatorname{Tr}_2(|ab\rangle\langle cd|)=|a\rangle\langle c|\cdot \langle b|d\rangle.

Then the reduced density operator of the subsystem \mathbb{C}^2 in first qubit is, note the \langle 0|0\rangle=\langle 1|1\rangle=1 and \langle 0|1\rangle=\langle 1|0\rangle=0:


\begin{aligned}
\rho_1&=\operatorname{Tr}_2(\rho)\\
&=\frac{1}{2}(\langle 1|1\rangle |0\rangle\langle 0|+\langle 0|1\rangle |0\rangle\langle 1|+\langle 1|0\rangle |1\rangle\langle 0|+\langle 0|0\rangle |1\rangle\langle 1|)\\
&=\frac{1}{2}(|0\rangle\langle 0|+|1\rangle\langle 1|)\\
&=\frac{1}{2}I
\end{aligned}

is a mixed state.

Purification

Let \rho be any state (may not be pure) on the finite dimensional Hilbert space \mathscr{H}. then there exists a unit vector w\in \mathscr{H}\otimes \mathscr{H} such that \rho=\operatorname{Tr}_2(|w\rangle\langle w|) is a pure state.

Proof

Let (u_1,u_2,\cdots,u_n) be an orthonormal basis of \mathscr{H} consisting of eigenvectors of \rho for the eigenvalues p_1,p_2,\cdots,p_n. As \rho is a states, p_i\geq 0 for all i and \sum_{i=1}^n p_i=1.

We can write \rho as


\rho=\sum_{i=1}^n p_i |u_i\rangle\langle u_i|

Let w=\sum_{i=1}^n \sqrt{p_i} u_i\otimes u_i, note that w is a unit vector (pure state). Then


\begin{aligned}
\operatorname{Tr}_2(|w\rangle\langle w|)&=\operatorname{Tr}_2(\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{p_ip_j} |u_i\otimes u_i\rangle \langle u_j\otimes u_j|)\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{p_ip_j} \operatorname{Tr}_2(|u_i\otimes u_i\rangle \langle u_j\otimes u_j|)\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{p_ip_j} \langle u_i|u_j\rangle |u_i\rangle\langle u_i|\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n \sqrt{p_ip_j} \delta_{ij} |u_i\rangle\langle u_i|\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^n p_i |u_i\rangle\langle u_i|\\
&=\rho
\end{aligned}

is a pure state.

QED

Drawing the connection between the space S^{2n+1}, CP^n, and \mathbb{R}

A pure quantum state of size N can be identified with a Hopf circle on the sphere S^{2N-1}.

A random pure state |\psi\rangle of a bipartite N\times K system such that K\geq N\geq 3.

The partial trace of such system produces a mixed state \rho(\psi)=\operatorname{Tr}_K(|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|), with induced measure \mu_K. When K=N, the induced measure \mu_K is the Hilbert-Schmidt measure.