4.8 KiB
Math4202 Topology II Exam 1 Review
Note
This is a review for definitions we covered in the classes. It may serve as a cheat sheet for the exam if you are allowed to use it.
Few important definitions
Quotient spaces
Let X be a topological space and f:X\to Y is a
- continuous
- surjective map.
- With the property that
U\subset Yis open if and only iff^{-1}(U)is open inX.
Then we say f is a quotient map and Y is a quotient space.
Theorem of quotient space
Let p:X\to Y be a quotient map, let Z be a space and g:X\to Z be a map that is constant on each set p^{-1}(y) for each y\in Y.
Then g induces a map f: X\to Z such that f\circ p=g.
The map f is continuous if and only if g is continuous; f is a quotient map if and only if g is a quotient map.
CW complex
Let X_0 be arbitrary set of points.
Then we can create X_1 by
X_1=\{(e_\alpha^1,\varphi_\alpha)|\varphi_\alpha: \partial e_\alpha^1\to X_0\}
where \varphi is a continuous map, and e_\alpha^1 is a $1$-cell (interval).
X_2=\{(e_\alpha^2,\varphi_\alpha)|\varphi_\alpha: \partial e_\alpha^2\to X_1\}=(\sqcup_{\alpha\in A}e_\alpha^2)\sqcup X_1
and e_\alpha^2 is a $2$-cell (disk). (mapping boundary of disk to arc (like a croissant shape, if you try to preserve the area))
The higher dimensional folding cannot be visualized in 3D space.
X_n=\{(e_\alpha^n,\varphi_\alpha)|\varphi_\alpha: \partial e_\alpha^n\to X_{n-1}\}=(\sqcup_{\alpha\in A}e_\alpha^n)\sqcup X_{n-1}
Example of CW complex construction
X_0=a
X_1= circle, with end point and start point at a
X_2= sphere (shell only), with boundary shrinking at the circle create by X_1
X_0=a
X_1=a
X_2= ballon shape with boundary of circle collapsing at a
Algebraic topology
Manifold
Definition of Manifold
An $m$-dimensional manifold is a topological space X that is
- Hausdorff
- With a countable basis
- Each point of
xofXhas a neighborhood that is homeomorphic to an open subset of\mathbb{R}^m. (local euclidean)
Whitney's Embedding Theorem
If X is a compact $m$-manifold, then X can be imbedded in \mathbb{R}^N for some positive integer N.
In general, X is not required to be compact. And N is not too big. For non compact X, N\leq 2m+1 and for compact X, N\leq 2m.
Definition for partition of unity
Let \{U_i\}_{i=1}^n be a finite open cover of topological space X. An indexed family of continuous function \phi_i:X\to[0,1] for i=1,...,n is said to be a partition of unity dominated by \{U_i\}_{i=1}^n if
\operatorname{supp}(\phi_i)=\overline{\{x\in X: \phi_i(x)\neq 0\}}\subseteq U_i(the closure of points where\phi_i(x)\neq 0is inU_i) for alli=1,...,n\sum_{i=1}^n \phi_i(x)=1for allx\in X(partition of function to1)
Existence of finite partition of unity
Let \{U_i\}_{i=1}^n be a finite open cover of a normal space X (Every pair of closed sets in X can be separated by two open sets in X).
Then there exists a partition of unity dominated by \{U_i\}_{i=1}^n.
Homotopy
Definition of null homology
If f:X\to Y is homotopy to a constant map. f is called null homotopy.
Definition of path homotopy
Let f,f':I\to X be a continuous maps from an interval I=[0,1] to a topological space X.
Two pathes f and f' are path homotopic if
- there exists a continuous map
F:I\times [0,1]\to Xsuch thatF(i,0)=f(i)andF(i,1)=f'(i)for alli\in I. F(s,0)=f(0)andF(s,1)=f(1),\forall s\in I.
Lemma: Homotopy defines an equivalence relation
The \simeq, \simeq_p are both equivalence relations.
Definition for product of paths
Given f a path in X from x_0 to x_1 and g a path in X from x_1 to x_2.
Define the product f*g of f and g to be the map h:[0,1]\to X.
Definition for equivalent classes of paths
\Pi_1(X,x) is the equivalent classes of paths starting and ending at x.
On \Pi_1(X,x),, we define \forall [f],[g],[f]*[g]=[f*g].
[f]\coloneqq \{f_i:[0,1]\to X|f_0(0)=f(0),f_i(1)=f(1)\}
Theorem for properties of product of paths
- If
f\simeq_p f_1, g\simeq_p g_1, thenf*g\simeq_p f_1*g_1. (Product is well-defined) ([f]*[g])*[h]=[f]*([g]*[h]). (Associativity)- Let
e_{x_0}be the constant path fromx_0tox_0,e_{x_1}be the constant path fromx_1tox_1. Supposefis a path fromx_0tox_1.
(Right and left identity)[e_{x_0}]*[f]=[f],\quad [f]*[e_{x_1}]=[f] - Given
finXa path fromx_0tox_1, we define\bar{f}to be the path fromx_1tox_0where\bar{f}(t)=f(1-t).f*\bar{f}=e_{x_0},\quad \bar{f}*f=e_{x_1}[f]*[\bar{f}]=[e_{x_0}],\quad [\bar{f}]*[f]=[e_{x_1}]